🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of states are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a bill increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," said the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this international discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and others show that policymakers internationally are less and less content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.